Question... When you are doing multiple math steps on a variable in an RM rule via Set Variable, have others seen a need to put delays between the math steps to ensure the variable gets updated before RM goes to the next action?
It has been working OK for me in testing but I don't do a lot of RM, or new hub variables, so thought I would ask people's experience.
Example below. Will RM do the actions so fast that "PoolRuntime" doesn't get updated before the next action runs?
EDIT: Since someone asked... The last set variable action is to put the DECIMAL variable into a NUMBER variable otherwise the RM rule will crash when you try to assign the decimal variable to a delay on a switch control action.
Probably as expected @bravenel , but I thought I would mention it. To say it more clearly, assigning DECIMAL hub variables to a switch off action delay makes the rule error out a la:
Example of variable math actions in a row:
