It seems my previous post was closed rather quickly, which I understand might have been due to its critical nature. As someone who has previously served as a moderator for a car forum, I always made it a point to keep discussions open as long as they were respectful and constructive, even if they contained criticism.
I value the community here and have supported your products for quite some time, both by purchasing devices and subscribing to monthly fees. However, I believe that open dialogue, even when it involves criticism, is essential for any community to thrive.
For example, I've noticed that on the Home Assistant forum, critical posts are usually addressed rather than closed. To clarify my point, I’d like to share my original post here. If this post is also closed, I'll understand your approach and will need to reconsider my position accordingly.
So here is my answer (that you can block again) :
Let’s take a specific example: Matter. You claim that Hubitat is compatible with Matter, but this claim lacks clarity. Which version of Matter are you referring to—1.1, 1.2, 1.3? It’s unclear because you don’t specify this information. Additionally, there’s no communication about what will be supported in the future, even without providing a roadmap.
I recently discovered that TRVs (Thermostatic Radiator Valves) are not currently supported, nor are bridges. There has been no communication about bridges at all, which is concerning, as many users are hopeful about them. More and more manufacturers are making their older devices available as Matter-compatible through bridges.
For a long time, I was undecided about whether to go with Home Assistant or the new C8 Pro hub. I ultimately chose the C8 Pro, assuming that Matter support would finally address the long-standing issue of missing TRV support (aside from the problematic Spirits). But, unfortunately, it turns out they are not supported.
Perhaps your statements seem clear to you, but as someone with experience in home automation, I find them confusing. And I’m not alone—many posts on this forum echo this sentiment. Bosch, for example, has a dedicated Matter page that clearly lists all compatible devices and those that are upcoming, with some marked as "uncertain" but with a commitment to integrate them as much as possible, even if success can’t be guaranteed.
BTW, some users here may be interested in how I achieved the results by CSS in my closed post, but they can't even ask now…