I’m wondering if this is possible or maybe something that can be considered on an update for RM.
I have several scenarios and comparisons which require to jump back and fort between several conditions. Right now, RM is linear in processing the instructions.
Is there a way to build a condition set, under a name that can be called out from the “master” rule?
My rules are extremely complex and long and it’s difficult to follow a chain of conditions when the same thing repeats itself under a different step.
I’m thinking something like this
If a is true
If b is true
If c is true and var is 0
and then somewhere within, one defines said functions
I’m currently McGyver-ing it with another rule per “function” but that adds clutter.
Is there a more elegant way to achieve that?