Mike,
I think that I have to eat some crow on this one.
It apparently came from the rule, not from the driver.
The rule was:
The log from the rule:
why it went to 62%, when 99% was called for, I don't know.
The result of the rule:
Depending on the driver and how the device reports with a fade time. It could be going to 99% but the only report that got sent was before the transition completed.
1 Like
It seemed to stay at 62%... How long should it take to get to the requested level, minutes?
It might not ever send another report.. You may have to request a report from it.. Usually by clicking refresh in the driver.
Now this is a z-wave plus device.. Are you using GenericZwaveDimmer or GenericZwaveSmartDimmer ?
OK. I will do refresh, and then complain if it's still at 62%. I'm OK with that approach.
How long should I want for it to go to 99% seconds or minutes?
What you're saying is that it's a reporting thing, and not an actual thing.
I was using the generic zwave smart dimmer, because it had "zwave plus" on the box.
With a fade time of 1 it should be 1 second.. Assuming the device handles that properly
Fade time of 0 should be instant
Anyway, I'm sure that you're very busy on the C7 issues, so thanks for taking the time to look at my simple matter.
I know that there are some "teething" issues, but I'm confident that you guys are going to straighten it out shortly (hopefully before my C7 comes in the mail!).
This topic was automatically closed 365 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.
