Zwave LR versus YoLink Proprietary LR: Which one is better?

Sure, I should never say never I guess. If I needed something I didn't want to make myself, and could live with the additional latency the cloud solution adds, then YoLink would be on my short list to use.

If YoLink ever made a hub that had a local MQTT server exposed without need of cloud, I would endorse it whole heartedly. Devices are well designed, a good price, and use good technology (even if it is a proprietary version of it).

They say they will add local control (and Matter) to their Hub 3. If/when they do, I'll pick up a hub and some devices and test it.

Lora radios are much more sensitive - like 30-40 dBm better than zwave 800, which is a LOT - which can help in the far distance/edge cases. Lora's modulation is also better, which makes it easier to get a successful transmission at low signal strength, but again that typically only comes into play in high interference or long distance transmissions.

Zwave LR is a very good protocol and in distances <500ft should perform (in practice, if not technically) very similar to many LoRa applications.

I do wish, however, that vendors would consider putting better (external) antennas on Zwave LR devices that are meant for outside use instead of the lame PCB ones. A few extra dB on the signal would make a big difference on many outdoor applications.

3 Likes

Hum. I have a Zooz ZSE70 LR motion sensor mounted outside on my garage on a brick wall and it working just fine.

From the data generated by the OP, it seems that we learned something about how one specific Zooz sensor compares to one specific Yolink sensor at one person’s house.

That doesn’t mean we can reliably extrapolate any conclusions to z-wave LR and LoRa more generally. It might, it might not.

You need more data to test your hypothesis.

4 Likes

This topic was automatically closed 24 hours after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.