Perhaps this is desired behavior and I do have a workaround so my rule does work. However it is strange and not what I expected so I thought to ask. I built a rule with a trigger based on two switch states being turned on. I clicked the drop down to pick my two switches then proceeded with the rest of the rule. I built this KISS style with the same style of trigger-then-wait design pattern that @bravenel described in the live video last week. Here is the trigger section as initially composed:
I expected that as the screenshot might suggest, when any of these switches turn on, the rule would trigger or re-trigger, then the cancel delayed actions would fire, etc. Unfortunately this did not work. The rule would not re-trigger. So I rebuilt the rule separating the two switch triggers:
This version does work as I expected. Switching either switch on causes the rule to re-trigger, then the cancel delay to occur, etc.
So is variant 1 "expected" behavior? If so this is a subtle difference that I only guessed given new experience with Rule Machine during the pandemic. Anyone have similar thoughts/stories?
