Thank you. I appreciate your response and acknowledgement.
I'm not completely sure that my concern was fully addressed though. My concern is that the changes to 2.2.9.129 that are announced in post two of the release notes announcement are not included in the platform update description that my hub showed me. I understand that my hub was not on the most current version prior to the release of 2.2.9.129 and I know that it would be impracticable to attempt to note all changes from one hub's particular platform version to the latest platform update that a hub is attempting to update to.
The release notes included in post two include:
Release 2.2.9.129 Available
Changes from 2.2.9.128
New App Features
Added optional Scene state indicator switch to Scene-1.2
Bug FixesFixed exception in Chromecast getStatus() call.
Fixed bug with Export/Import/Clone.
Fixed bug with Scene-1.2 showing correct scene state.
Rule 5.1:
Fixed bug with Time Since Event.
Fixed bug with use of local variables in Between Two Times/Dates.
Platform changesModified /hub/allowSubnets endpoint to allow CIDR subnets (e.g. 1.2.3.4/24).
Added logging for refused HTTP connections and app type loading.
It is the above to which I am referring.
I have gone back and looked at the platform update description that my hub is giving me relative to upgrading to version 2.2.9.129 and none of the items quoted above are included in that description. Again, this might be a common practice amongst the developer community or even wider than that but I am not of that world so if such is the case I would appreciate if the platform update description that the hub provides explicitly notes that the description provided is not purported to include changes that were relevant enough to be described in a subsequent post to the release notes on this forum. I get that hot fixes for bugs or any other update that isn't specifically called to users' attention in the forum are not as relevant to some or most users. But if the updates make the forum then they seem relevant enough that someone thought it necessary to list them so that is where my concern remains.
Was this an accidental oversight or is it a common practice of which I am not aware?