Thanks for the clarification...I can see where the lock codes add more complexity! In my "Lock Code Monitor" app, I subscribed to lock and basically had to ignore unlock and only process lock when there was lock code data, so there is some work there.
What would be way cool is if a person could put %device% %value% [by %user%] and the part in brackets would be ignored if not applicable...
What I need is RM to just use whatever the lock code sends it verses a check box of codes for me to choose. Now the LCM is available (and hopefully will have more automation enable/disable in the future) I need RM to just do notifications on whatever is sent from the lock.
Currently I have to go into RM and change the rule each time I add/remove someone from the doors. This is a PITA as I have restrictions per door verses all doors.
Unless I missed something RM can't do this today correct?
Just to be clear...I would like RM to tell me the name value of the code that unlocked the door no matter if RM knows of that code/name or not.
Example:
Luke Skywalker unlocks front door with code 1234
RM sends push notification that "%device% was %value% by %lockname%"
%device% = front door
% value% = unlocked
%lockname% = Luke Skywalker
HE Admin; Darth Vader, adds through LCM a new user called "Princess Leia" with code 4321 but doesn't do anything to RM as he is too busy building another death star
Princess Leia unlocks garage door with code 4321
RM sends push notification that "%device% was %value% by %lockname%"
That is fine then. Just would like RM to not care if it is Luke Skywalker, Darth Maul or Obie-won. Just tell me they unlocked the door without me adding them to RM.
But If I make a RM rule exactly as @bravenel shows above - i.e. Any Lock Code as the trigger, on my system it ALWAYS evaluates as true and stays TRUE... So is unusable... See below - the doors are actually UNLOCKED right now... Not sure why it is TRUE...